E-commerce squeezes Bata India's margin
April 29, 2016
Increasing pressure from a surge in sale of shoes online has impacted Bata India\'s margins.
In January 2012, the Union government allowed 100 per cent foreign direct investment (FDI) in single brand retail. And, footwear brands have been at the forefront in making most of it. Currently, three of the top global brands - Reebok, Nike and Adidas - have branded stores in India. According to analysts, this impacted Bata's sales further in the country.
"Running a network of retail shoe outlets is tough in here. Usually, the overhead costs exceed total sales. Both Reebok and Adidas have shut down stores in India before, just like any other big retail chain brands," a retail industry executive said. Adidas and Reebok have 760 and 250 outlets respectively. Bata has more than 1,400 branded stores in India.
According to the report, Bata has lost out to foreign footwear brands as they "continue to reap benefits of disintermediation". Disintermediation is a process under which less number of intermediaries, such as distributors and dealers, are involved to reduce costs. Currently, distribution margin stands at 55 per cent of the total selling price of shoes for companies like Bata, which depends heavily on its established retail outlets for offtake. And its investment on branding remains lower at Rs 110 crore during 2009 and FY15, compared with expenditure in the brick and mortar store - Rs 500 crore during the same period. According to a consumer goods industry consultant, foreign brands have focused intensely on branding. "Branding exercises are crucial in the days of consumerism," he said.
Another factor that impacted its sale in recent times is the growing e-commerce space. The e-commerce sector in India grew 35 per cent in 2015 and is expected to grow by 67 per cent in 2016 to Rs 2,55,000 crore. According to the report, Bata has been affected as "the impact of e-commerce impairs its ability to absorb high fixed costs". The shoemaker's fixed cost currently stands at 35 per cent of sales.
Lack of enough investment in branding, compared to enhancing its brick and mortar presence is another factor that is at work. "Bata could have been an ideal omni-channel beneficiary, but underinvestment in the brand and rapid shift of footwear to online make us less sanguine," it said.
To improve its financial performance, analysts suggest reduction in distribution costs. According to analysts from Spark Capital Advisors, now "Bata is adopting a calibrated approach in widening its retail footprint," deviating from its earlier store expansion strategy. "We realise that not only are rental leases being re-negotiated to take advantage of the subdued real estate environment, but store sizes are also being optimised to drive efficiency," they said.
Bata's rental cost has grown at a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 24 per cent, compared with 14 per cent revenue growth between 2010 and 2015-16 (estimated). This will keep its rental costs stable. In 2014-15, its rental costs formed 13.9 of sales - up by 390 bps from 2010 at nine per cent.